
When a top photographer takes a photo of a poor child or of a desperate situation and gets the people’s attention to that problem, who is on the side that takes charity and who on the side that gives? Most would say that the photographer, the journalist or the blogger is the one who deserves the credit. I would argue that the opposite is true. Where would the photographer be without these perfect scenes that popped to his eyes, without the perfect compositions that form before his eyes without any effort from his side?
More than the photographer redeems the poor man, the poor man redeems the photographer.
I’m not saying that photography isn’t a noble profession. But when the photographer comes up with a wonderful image of a poor child, he is doing so not to help the child but to make the child himself a beautiful object. The photographer’s image is not the child’s savior but an objectification of that child.

As a photographer, are you just a bystander, a scientific observer? Do you have any influence or responsibility for what is happening right in front of your lens? How are you interacting with your environment when you are out there?





